1. H&E/PAS slide scoring: subjective vs. objective?
2. Objective enables reproducibility
Starting from 2025-06-01, several Nature Portforlio journals (i.e. Nature Communications, Nature Cell Biology, Nature Methods, and Nature Structural & Molecular Biology) would ask authors to finish a reporting table summarizing key aspects, including image collection and image processing of light microscopy experiments, at revision stage1.
The reporting table will be shared with reviewers.
The reporting table will be published as a type of supplementary information.
The reporting table contains five sections describing the following information:
Hardware.
Quality control.
Methodology.
Acquisition.
Imaging processing: software used for analysis and any workflows or parameters applied to the image data presented.
The Nature Portforlio journals also:
encourage authors to deposit their microscopy datasets in public repositories, as is routinely expected in other fields, such as genomics and proteiomics1.
GeneCard-BioImage believes rational image-relevant experiment design (wet lab work) and objective image analysis (dry lab work) are two important factors for reproducibility.
3. Subjective vs. objective? (for fun😂)
# The value of "objective"objective <-"Objective"|>utf8ToInt() |>sum() *-1cat("The value of 'objective':", objective, "\n")
The value of 'objective': -923
# The value of "subjective"subjective <-"Subjective"|>utf8ToInt() |>sum() *-1cat("The value of 'subjective':", subjective, "\n")
The value of 'subjective': -1044
# Subjective - objectiveresult <- subjective - objective cat("The result of 'subjective - objective':", result, "\n")
The result of 'subjective - objective': -121
# Conclusionconclusion <-ifelse(result >0, "Conclusion:'Subjective' is better than 'Objective' because 'Subjective' is larger~", "Conclusion: 'Objective' is better than 'Subjective' because 'Objective' is larger~")cat(conclusion, "\n")
Conclusion: 'Objective' is better than 'Subjective' because 'Objective' is larger~